Phil La Duke's Blog

Fresh perspectives on safety and Performance Improvement

Case Management Atrocities

By Phil La Duke

Nobody likes a cheat.  Whether the cheater is fraudulently collecting disability insurance that is not his or her due, or the cheater who fakes an injury so that she can get undeserved light duty.  But I have noticed an alarming and disappointing tendency among organizations who brag about their case management as if, cheating injured workers out of their legal claims of disability pay.

Before any of you furrow your brows and type of an indignant “how dare you…” email, I am not talking about those among us who act in good faith and try to weed out the dishonest who steal from the company by claiming injuries that don’t exist, or that exist but were caused outside the workplace.  But on the other hand, if this hits close to home, maybe you ought examine your conscious and if it sounds like I’m talking to you I probably am, and if I am, you should be ashamed of yourself.

Let’s begin by level setting. No one wants to get hurt, and while there are some people with larcenous hearts, most people (and I use the word “most” judiciously and correctly—to denote the majority of people, as in more than half.) don’t want to take money fraudulently.

Most Claims Are Legit

I further believe that most injury claims are legitimate; people get hurt, report, the injury and hope to get back to work as soon as possible.  I believe that most fraudulent claims are at least on some level legitimate; people get hurt but they either exaggerate the extent of the injury or deliberately milk the time off work so they can malinger while living on the dole. But there’s a lot of grey area between the legitimately injured and the fraudulently injured, and too often organizations treat all injured workers as if they are liars and thieves.

Misguided Case Management Workers

There are some case management professionals who view the core purpose of their jobs as denying benefits.  Most are decent, ethical people, but they may still be under the mistaken impression that denying disability benefits on a technicality is the right thing to do. This may not be their fault.  A friend of mine has been a policeman for over twenty years. He told me that if he had it to do over again he would have chosen another career.  Not because he doesn’t have the same values that led him to chose that path in the first place, but because, as he explained , a policeman tends to see people when they are at their worst (watch an episode of Cops and you will understand what he’s talking about). So I guess I shouldn’t blame a veteran case management professional who starts to view injured worker with something of a jaded eye, but this assumption that workers are guilty until proven innocent hinders our ability to create a culture where workers value safety.

While some people do fraudulently make claims (after all, if they didn’t, it’s likely that claims management wouldn’t exist, or at least it wouldn’t exist to the extent that it currently does) it’s the grey areas that case management can get dicey and where otherwise compassionate and ethical case managers are tempted to go off the rails, morally speaking.

Take for example, the case of worker who strains his back on a Friday but doesn’t report the injury and then helps his brother-in-law roof his house.  In the middle of roofing job, he realizes that he has been injured more seriously than he initially believed.  He reports the injury on Monday. In this case, the claims management team is likely to dispute the claim (because a weekend has passed between the alleged injury and the claim.) If the worker is honest and admits that he had been engaged in manual labor on the weekend the claim is likely to be denied, even though it is completely legitimate.  In this case the case management professional has to little choice but to dispute the claim.  The tragedy here is that the fraudulent claimant is far more likely to seek the services of a skivvy lawyer that specializes in fraudulent medical cases while the legitimately injured worker is punished for telling the truth.

What’s more, this is a situation that most organizations have created.  They offer incentives for not reporting injuries—safety BINGOs, bonuses for no injuries, and similar programs make it uncomfortable to report an injury, even one that the injured party knows is a legitimate workplace injury.  The dirty little secret of too many behavior based safety programs is that they encourage injured workers to seek outside medical attention and keep the injuries off the books.  While this is a great way to make the company’s safety record look good, it’s basically just juking the stats.

The Nuremburg Defense

I am sure to get a view angry emails that defend Case Management abuses (and they are abuses even if they are the by-product of unintended and subconscious biases) as attacking case management professionals for “only doing their jobs”.  I reject this criticism out of hand.  No one can every justify doing the wrong thing by claiming that he or she is only doing his or her job.  It didn’t work for the Nazis and Nuremburg and it doesn’t work for case management workers.  The key to ethical case management is in training and in expectations.  Those who provide medical attention to workers need to understand that the difference between a recordable injury and one that is not is often as simple as the kind of pain reliever administered to the worker.  This is not to say that a physician should be discouraged from doing what’s best for the patient, but all things being equal why not avoid a recordable?

Workers should be trained on the importance of timely and accurate reporting of injuries and more attention should be focused on eliminating injuries, identifying and reporting hazards and near misses, and drawn away from denying claims.

Further, claims managers should be taught that their jobs aren’t about catching cheaters, rather, it is to protect the workers from being wrongly denied benefits at the hands of corporate jackals, and protect the company from people who would rather sit home watching Judge Judy and fraudulently collect disability funds. It’s a undeniably a tough job, but one they chose, after all, it’s not like they were pressed into service after getting falling down drunk in a waterfront pub.

Filed under: Phil La Duke, Safety, ,

11 Responses

  1. Paul Miller says:

    Can you state specific facts to your accusations? Are these mere opinions? Which States are your Case Managment Atrocities occurring?


    • Phil La Duke says:

      Yes I can. Yes they are opinions, as blogs are opinion pieces. Primarily in southern states. I have first hand knowledge of this happening in South and North Carolina, Virginia, but I’m sure they happen elsewhere. Do you act like this in real life? Do you burst in a room and shout emotional questions to strangers? Perhaps you should grow the hell up.

      But thanks for reading and thanks for your knee jerk and alarmed comments.



      • jonnyalter says:

        Cleaning up my coffee as well. Phil, perhaps you can start a side business selling laptop splash guards. Call it the “Phillaspalsh”.


      • George Rose says:

        LOL…..Phil, I love reading your blog weather I agree with you or not. However, I truly look forward to blog comments and in particular your response. I was drinking coffee while reading your above reply and now I’m cleaning up a mess. I love your no BS sharp edge. Some may be offended but I appreciate it.

        That aside, while working as a fire officer and one of my firefighters stated to me after a job, “damn, I twisted my wrist, back, ankle, blah, blah, blah….but I’ll be O.K” I would always document the incident and generate a report for file even if they remained on duty. As you stated, an incident can have a delayed effect.


      • Phil La Duke says:


        I’ve been called everything but a child of God for my blog and my responses, but I’m glad you enjoy them. This is a subject that is near and dear to me. I have heard to many safety professionals brag about how their numbers are down and then quickly follow up with “but a lot of that is just better case management.” If we stop hurting workers it doesn’t matter how we manage cases. Still, I can’t emphasis enough my agreement with your opinion on getting an injury on record. Some injuries are cumulative—it takes repeated minor injuries to incapacitate a worker. Too often these days workers are reluctant to have an injury on their record for fear it will adversely affect their ability to retain their existing jobs or gain future employment should they lose their jobs. This is a real issue, although, there are some hysterically emotional dopes out there who think I just sit around making this stuff up. Thanks for reading and thanks for your comment.


  2. 2tone67 says:

    I concur with 2 of the three above comments Your straight shootin retorts, are often the highlight of your blog (probably not what you want to hear :))
    However in this case I feel you have hit the nail square on the head. Timely reporting of injuries (even twinges etc.), abolition of safety incentive schemes and less reliance on lag indicators (LTIs etc.), would help make a significant change to the situation you outline here in your post.
    Every system is going to have its ‘cheats’ who will endeavor diligently to exploit a loophole or technicality but by in large this doesn’t mean we should lose sight of why that system was put into place in the first instance.
    I applaud your heartfelt call to action, Phil
    Thanks for the good read.


    • Phil La Duke says:


      Thanks for reading and thanks for your comment, and I am fully aware that my response to comments are the highlight of the blog for many readers. And I have no problem with that. My business partner in particular gets a kick out of the fact that I have no problem telling people what I think. I used to worry about it, but given that their are a significant number of mouth-breathers out there looking to take offense at every word, I can’t be careful with what I write. Plus, generally I get called out by the self-righteous and the stupid (or the all to combination there of) when I strike a nerve. Since I don’t actively court that demographic telling them to shut up and go play doesn’t bother me.
      I don’t like that it bothers some, otherwise cool people (usually how I treat the dullards, not my content), but you can’t make an omelet without slapping some dumbass up side the head, or something like that.

      I knew going into this that I would upset some case managers, and that it would probably rankle the BBS fanatics (seriously they are more mental than a cult of Cthulhu) so one negative comment doesn’t surprise me.

      I have been trying to change my email (for the record my proper email is but wordpress isn’t all that quick about things so my listed email is a dead account.

      My only regret on this particular post is that I didn’t take a stronger stance. I think this problem is far more widespread than people think or are willing to admit.

      When we treat our workers as liars, cheats, and thieves we will have a workplace where only liars, cheats, and thieves will be willing to work.

      And for all you people spilling coffee, you need to be more careful.



  3. I guess it really depends on the case and how it will be handled. The only thing an injured individual could do is to consult an attorney since as what you have pointed out, most injury claims are legitimate and that they can really benefit from the injury they have experience. Thank you for posting an informative article.


  4. John Carter says:

    I just read your this article and found it to be interesting. All points are well taken. I have to agree with George totally. But really to be honest, I admire your tenacity and for being so direct about your blog. Thanks again and happy holidays!


    • Phil La Duke says:

      Thanks John. Not all case management assumes people are committing fraud. And frankly not all cases are fraudulent. I saw a Worker’s comp claim for a case (that no one fought) of excessive earwax in a facility that didn’t require ear protection.


  5. An attorney is definitely in place. I believe with a good lawyer, the claims will out right be given.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Guest blogs

La Duke in the News


Press Release

Professional Organizations


Safety Professional's Resource Room

Social Networking


Web Resource


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,114 other followers

%d bloggers like this: